With 4. At 18 cents a gig, this product can be a great value, though performance is still a question on this drive, and I hope to get to the bottom of that today, so let's get right to it. Not a whole lot to say here the Silicon Power A55 GB uses blister packaging which I assume is to keep costs down and has hanger hooks to keep on store shelves.
At this price, I can't expect a whole lot, though the instructions inside the box are pretty neat for someone who has never installed an SSD before, and the label is stickered on there.
I use a Ryzen test bench for my reviews, since most other websites test with Intel mainstream platforms, I personally think this is useful for all of those users who are using AMD's Ryzen CPUs and AM4 socket motherboards to get a good idea on what kind of performance they should expect. Crystal Disk Info is a wide tool for displaying the characteristics and health of storage devices.
It will display temperatures, the number of power on hours, the number of times it has been powered on, and even informing you of the firmware version of the device.
As one of the top tools utilized in the industry, Disk Benchmark identifies performance in hard drives, solid state drives, RAID arrays as well as the host connection to attached storage.
The ATTO compressable data shows at smaller file sizes this thing keeps up and even beats the MXthough once we start ramping up the file sizes it begins to trail off as it takes dead last. Mixed results for this drive for sure. CrystalDiskMark is a disk benchmark software Made by a Japanese coder named Hiyohiyo and is one of the simplest and most frequently used tests for storage due to its simple and easy to understand UI.
AS SSD is the opposite of ATTO as it uses incompressible data rather than compressible data and simulates the worst possible scenario imaginable for an SSD which gives the best understanding of performance when pushing the drive to its limits.
In the IOPS test, we see the write speeds show up terribly at the smaller bit tests though its read speeds are respectable. In 4k performance, it does a good job at keeping up in everything except for 64T reads which it comes in dead last, somewhat disappointing here. For the transfer speed part of the test, the A55 GB does well in sequential performance Not a surprise but does poorly in 4k reads, though its write performance is quite solid all around.
When being pushed hard this drive shows its faults. For real-world testing, we have decided to use Diskbench to move a large game directory The Witcher 3 which comes in just under 43GB with a nice mixture of large and small files.
We use this workload to simulate either a gamer moving the games of his primary drive to a secondary drive or someone moving large directories over. It keeps up a decent pace with the performance king we had earlier this month the Crucial MX The PCMark 8 Storage Benchmark is used to create real-world testing scenarios that many users use on an everyday basis. With 10 traces recorded from Adobe Creative Suite, Microsoft Office and as well as Battlefield 3 and World Of Warcraft, the light to heavy common workloads have been represented.Long loading times are one of our biggest issues with current-gen consoles.
Solid-state storage drives are the future, and the question is, can PlayStation 4 Pro - with its brand-new, high bandwidth SATA 3 interface - finally take a good-sized chunk out of the extended pauses between gameplay that are often part and parcel of modern console gaming? We've been here before of course, having carried out extensive testing of the improvements an SSD makes to both Xbox One and PS4 gamingand we still retain the backup archive we used previously to put various drives through their paces on Sony's platform.
OCZ's Trion drive does not represent the fastest technology on the market by any stretch of the imagination, but the point is that it doesn't need to be. We simply need to see appreciable gains in like-for-like testing to ascertain that the PS4 Pro's SATA 3 interface is capable of getting more from solid-state technology. The OCZ unit is certainly capable of delivering more.
The PC version installed on the OCZ drive loads up the same area - with ultra-level textures no less - in just It's over twice as fast and the drive is clearly much more capable. The question is, can the PS4 Pro more fully utilise it? This first test offers up a pretty conclusive answer straight off the bat, with the Pro only offering up a two second advantage over the same drive hosting the same data on the standard PlayStation 4.
The supposed advantage of SATA 3's higher data throughput is clearly being cut short by a bottleneck elsewhere in the system.
The chances are that game loading speeds are still limited by a set cap on data transfer throughput. It ensures that other background processes - like installing, downloading, and the recording features - can all run at once on whatever mechanical hard drive Sony can acquire in bulk volume for its latest production run.
SATA 3 is offering up an advantage of sorts, but the reductions are hardly game-changing. The bottom line is that in this case, loading up a Witcher 3 save game still takes over one minute. That's 78 seconds versus 92 - cutting 14 seconds off the clock with the PS4 Pro's default drive. It's an improvement we see in almost all scenarios and is clearly a welcome boost. While the 2.
The Witcher 3 results serve as a template that carries over into several other games. Fallout 4 is a great example; we picked a saved game in Concord town - one of the longest initial loads we've found, at 55 seconds on the base PS4's stock drive. When it comes to the SSD results though, again, we're staring at similar, slight margins between base and Pro models, with just a three second advantage on the new console. However, once again, we're getting a more tangible gain when comparing the stock mechanical drives - a seven second boost on the Pro.
Just Cause 3 offers up some differing results too. It's unusual compared to most of our other tests, but it shows there's some variance when it comes to mechanical drives with large tables of contents. Of course, not every title has such long loading times.Forums New posts Search forums.What SSD To Buy As Fast As Possible
I am no expert in SSD'sbut I can say it has the phison pss10x controller. And it does have some DRAM cache onboard. I will post some benchmarks once it is installed. Hope this helps anyone on the fence. Numerous Reddit posts rumoured this was made from the same assembly line as the WD blue SSD's although I don't know for sure if that was true.
I also saw this posted on a Reddit post.During these challenging times, we guarantee we will work tirelessly to support you. We will continue to give you accurate and timely information throughout the crisis, and we will deliver on our mission — to help everyone in the world learn how to do anything — no matter what.
Thank you to our community and to all of our readers who are working to aid others in this time of crisis, and to all of those who are making personal sacrifices for the good of their communities.
Article Edit. Learn why people trust wikiHow. This article was co-authored by our trained team of editors and researchers who validated it for accuracy and comprehensiveness.
The wikiHow Tech Team also followed the article's instructions and validated that they work. Learn more Explore this Article Steps. Related Articles. Right-click This PC. A menu will appear. Click Properties. Click Advanced system settings. This opens the System Properties dialog. Enter your administrator password if prompted.
A list of performance options will appear. Click the Advanced tab. Click Change…. This opens the Virtual Memory dialog, which is where you can configure how much of your hard drive will be used as RAM. Click your SSD drive.Your processor can handle billions of cycles a second, but it often spends a lot of time waiting for your drive to feed it data.
You can check out our feature for much more on the differences between hard drives and SSDs. While the latter are almost always faster, there are still instances like bulk storage where hard drives are definitely worth considering. If you already know about drive types and want specific recommendations, check out our Best SSDs page.
Silicon Power A55 512GB Review – Is It Any Good?
And if you're after an external drive or SSD for portable storage or back up, be sure to check our Best External Drives page. And those existing SATA drives will have to continue falling in price as well, in order to at least compete on price, since they can't hope to keep up with NVMe drives on performance.
You may have heard about blazing-fast next-generation PCIe 4. These drives will indeed up sequential speeds dramatically thanks to a doubling of the PCIe bus bandwidth. And in many ways, beyond the obvious bump in sequential performance, users might not see much in the way of real-world benefits from these drives. While it's not officially confirmed to be using the Phison controller, an upcoming Lexar drive has been shown surpassing 7GBps. Most consumer drives range from GB to 2TB. While GB drives are the cheapest, they aren't roomy enough to hold a lot of software and are usually slower than their higher-capacity counterparts.
The delta between GB and GB drives can be slightly more, but GB is the sweet spot between price, performance and capacity for most users--particularly if you don't have the budget for a 1TB model. There are also some drives primarily from Samsung with capacities above 2TB. Solid-state drives these days come in several different form factors and operate across several possible hardware and software connections.
How to Buy the Right SSD: A Guide for 2020
What kind of drive you need depends on what device you have or are intending on buying. Moving data at extreme speeds generates a fair bit of heat. While most M. You can tell by the four or five-digit number in their names, with the first two digits representing width and the others showing length. The most common size is labeled M. Though laptops will only work with one size, many desktop motherboards have anchor points for longer and shorter drives.
The largest M. So, if you have a generous budget and need a ton of storage space, you should consider other form factors.
Strap in, because this bit is more complicated than it should be. As noted earlier, 2. And the fastest M. The tricky bit OK, another tricky bit is that an M. That said, most fast M.NVMe is no longer a nice-to-have storage technology. Bottom line: NVMe is fast. Really fast. Like never-have-to-wait-again-for-your-computer fast. Programs pop open, files load and save in an instant, and the machine boots and shuts down in just a few seconds.
Not only that, but it locates them 10 times as fast seek. The approximate performance ceilings for the three mainstream storage technologies as things now stand are:. Not that you need sustained throughput like this very often, but NVMe makes short work of transferring files of any size. Longer bars are better.
Shorter bars are better, but this is an overall average. Some drives in each category might do better, some will do worse. Hard drives still offer tremendous bang for the buck in terms of capacity and are wonderful for less-used data.
Knowing well the ultimate performance potential of NAND-based SSDs even when they first showed up, it was clear to the industry that a new bus and protocol would eventually be needed. Even version 3. PCIe is the underlying data transport layer for graphics and other add-in cards. As of generation 3. PCIe is also the foundation for the Thunderbolt interface, which is starting to pay dividends with external graphics cards for gaming, as well as external NVMe storage, which is nearly as fast as internal NVMe.
NVMe removes their constraints by offering low-latency commands, and multiple queues—up to 64K of them. The latter is particularly effective because data is written to SSDs in shotgun fashion, scattered about the chips and blocks, rather than contiguously in circles as on a hard drive.
The NVMe standard has continued to evolve to the present version 1. All recent versions of the major operating systems provide drivers, and regardless of the age of the system you will have a very fast drive on your hands.
That requires BIOS support. But simply having an M. The former, called B-keyed a key is a rise that marries with a gap in the contacts on the drivehas six contacts separated from the rest, while the latter, M-keyed, has five contacts separated from the rest on the opposite side. These are also sometimes referred to as socket 2 and socket 3. What you as an end user should avoid are 2. These require the U. While just about any NVMe should make your system feel quicker, they are not all alike.
Not even close. The difference can be even greater when the amount of data written exceeds the amount of cache on board. Here are some rules of thumb:. Check out our SSD reviews at for the skinny on individual drives. Western Digital. The approximate performance ceilings for the three mainstream storage technologies as things now stand are: IDG Not that you need sustained throughput like this very often, but NVMe makes short work of transferring files of any size.
Samsung An M. The more NAND chips, the more paths and destinations the controller has to distribute and store data at. Smaller-capacity drives are quite often slower than the larger capacity drives, even given the same model number.We couldn't recommend this model to anyone given the slight price difference.
Let's be honest, if you bring a product with the name "Ultimate" to marketit had better deliver. It can't be average, regular, or even mainstream.
Most importantly, though, it had better not be sub-par. Over the last few years, many DRAM-turned-SSD companies have aligned with a single controller or flash manufacturer and continued to release cookie-cutter products using reference designs. In contrast, Adata doesn't like being in a box with limited options. Because of that, the company offers several different products that often overlap.
When a new technology comes to market, Adata is often the first non-fab to bring it to market regardless of the original source of the components. Adata's wide range of products is good for consumers, but there are negative aspects to the approach.
The development cost of working with two or three NAND flash companies and a handful of flash processor designers is inevitably higher than working with a shorter list of partners. Over time, Adata has learned quite a bit by working with so many partners, so one project gives greater insight into how to approach the next. Sadly, everything has a starting point. No one expected it to be a jump from 1, GB to 1, GB.
That is what Crucial's MX product delivered, along with a few other oddball capacities. Micron also paired the first generation 3D TLC flash with an entry-level 4-channel controller that amplified the poor latency of the flash. The performance cost of a few extra gigabytes of space was much more; I would call it a penalty. Micron and Intel themselves have both released under-performing products using the technology, but to put it into perspective but not to step on itwe are not just talking about below average.
Adata used one-third of the capacity, essentially all of the extra space Gbit of the total Gbit dieto build a massive SLC buffer. That eliminates any capacity advantage, but it does give us a massive buffer that should at least on paper be very fast. The largest capacity has yet to ship in the channel. We have the three low-capacity drives to test and analyze. We tested this controller and flash combination in a technical preview article earlier this year. The technical preview delivers much more detail about the controller and its inner workings than this article.
If the SSD manufacturer does not disclose the feature set, we try not to highlight the controller features that might be embedded in the retail SSD. Some controller features may be enabled even though the SSD maker hasn't released the information. On the other side of the coin, the vendor may have disabled some of the features, as well. The other capacities have slight performance variations.